Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Some pluralist systems, including Scots regulation in Scotland and types of civil law jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, never precisely in good shape into the dual common-civil law system classifications. These types of systems may perhaps have been seriously influenced with the Anglo-American common law tradition; however, their substantive legislation is firmly rooted from the civil law tradition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the figured out counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession from the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this facet for interim custody of the topic premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or even the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed into the disposal of the instant petition to the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner as well as private respondents and will choose care of every one of the components of the case and ensure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Most of the volumes (which includes more recent volumes than the library's holdings) are obtainable online through the Caselaw Access Project.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year outdated boy from his home to protect him from the Terrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced endured in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children in the home. The boy was placed within an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted close to within the foster care system.
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation includes the names with the parties to the first case, the court in which the case was listened to, the date it had been decided, and the book in which it is actually recorded. Different citation requirements may possibly contain italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling around the same kind of case.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may perhaps interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mould the relief to really make it correct into the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified from the decision with the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative in the regulation laid down by the Supreme Court inside the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Hence, the competent authority from the parent department of the petitioner along with the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of the petitioner and fork out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits into read more the petitioner to which He's entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority with the respondent is additionally directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of your petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
ten. Based about the findings with the inquiry committee, this petition will not be regarded maintainable and is therefore liable for being dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there may very well be one particular or more judgments presented (or reported). Only the reason to the decision from the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could be adopted in an argument.
Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners may seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more